MICROBIOLOGY

Microbial Bioremediation of oil spills


  1. U.S. Ecological Coverage Department, Cincinnati, Ohio 452682;
  2. Microbial Insights Inc., Rockford, Tennessee ; and
  3. Biological Sciences Division, Oak Ridge Nationwide Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 378314

ABSTRACT

Three crude oil bioremediation practices had been used in a randomized block area test simulating a coastal oil spill. Four treatments (no oil control, oil alone, oil plus nutrients, and oil plus nutrients plus an indigenous inoculum) were applied. In situ microbial community structures were administered by phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) analysis and 16S rDNA PCR-denaturing gradient serum electrophoresis (DGGE) to (i) identify the microbial community people in charge of the decontamination associated with website and (ii) establish a conclusion point the elimination of the hydrocarbon substrate. The outcomes of PLFA evaluation demonstrated a residential area change throughout plots from mainly eukaryotic biomass to gram-negative microbial biomass with time. PLFA pages from the oiled plots suggested increased gram-negative biomass and version to metabolic tension in comparison to unoiled controls. DGGE evaluation of untreated control plots revealed a straightforward, dynamic prominent populace construction through the experiment. This banding structure disappeared throughout oiled plots, showing the construction and variety of the prominent microbial community changed substantially. No constant distinctions had been detected between nutrient-amended and native inoculum-treated plots, but both differed from oil-only plots. Prominent rings had been excised for series evaluation and suggested that oil treatment encouraged the growth of gram-negative microorganisms inside the α-proteobacteria andFlexibacter-Cytophaga-Bacteroides phylum. α-Proteobacteria were never ever recognized in unoiled settings. PLFA analysis indicated that by week 14 the microbial community frameworks of this oiled plots were getting much like those associated with unoiled controls through the same time point, but DGGE analysis recommended that significant variations in the bacterial communities remained.

FOOTNOTES

  • Received 1 March 1999.
  • Corresponding author. Mailing address: U.S. ecological cover Agency, 26 W. Martin Luther King Dr., Cincinnati, OH 45268. Phone: (513) 569-7668. Fax: (513) 569-7105. E-mail: venosa.albert{at}epamail.epa.gov.


Share this article





Related Posts


Number of oil spills
Number of oil spills

Latest Posts
Oil spill in Alaska
Oil spill in…
Rosanna Endre, activist, Sweden. Today…
BP oil spill animals affected
BP oil spill…
Federal wildlife officials reported that…
Deepwater oil spill
Deepwater oil…
A view of soft coral near Looe Key north…
Historical oil spills
Historical oil…
Location: Kuwait Gallons: 240 to 336…
Using bacteria to clean up oil spills
Using bacteria…
Alberta s oil sands may be home the world…
Search
Featured posts
  • Consequences of oil spills
  • Number of oil spills
  • Causes of oil spills in the ocean
  • Meaning of oil spills
  • Photos of oil spills
  • Pictures of oil spills
  • History of oil spills
  • Different types of oil spills
  • Dangers of oil spills
Copyright © 2021 l www.hispecsales.com. All rights reserved.